On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:20:51PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote: > Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > diff --git a/bloom.c b/bloom.c > > index 9b6a30f6f6..739fa093ba 100644 > > --- a/bloom.c > > +++ b/bloom.c > > @@ -250,6 +250,23 @@ static void init_truncated_large_filter(struct bloom_filter *filter, > > filter->version = version; > > } > > > > +struct bloom_filter *get_bloom_filter(struct repository *r, struct commit *c) > > +{ > > + struct bloom_filter *filter; > > + int hash_version; > > + > > + filter = get_or_compute_bloom_filter(r, c, 0, NULL, NULL); > > + if (!filter) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + prepare_repo_settings(r); > > + hash_version = r->settings.commit_graph_changed_paths_version; > > + > > + if (!(hash_version == -1 || hash_version == filter->version)) > > + return NULL; /* unusable filter */ > > + return filter; > > +} > > I missed this the last time, but this should match what fill_bloom_key() > does. Use get_bloom_filter_settings(), I'm not sure I'm following. Are you saying that we should use get_bloom_filter_settings() instead of reading the value from r->settings directly? > then compare filter->version to version 2 if hash_version is 2, and to > version 1 otherwise. Hmm. I think we're already doing the right thing here, no? IIUC, you're saying to do something like: struct bloom_filter_settings *s = get_bloom_filter_settings(r); struct bloom_filter *f = get_or_compute_bloom_filter(r, c, ...); int hash_version; if (!f) return NULL; prepare_repo_settings(r); hash_version = r->settings.commit_graph_changed_paths_version; if (!(hash_version == -1 || hash_version == s->hash_version)) return NULL; /* incompatible */ return f; ? If so, I think that we're already OK here, since s->hash_version is always going to take the same value as f->version, since f->version is assigned in bloom.c::load_bloom_filter_from_graph(), which does: filter->version = g->bloom_filter_settings->hash_version; Or are we talking about two different things entirely? ;-) Thanks, Taylor