Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
On 10/08/2023 23:00, Linus Arver wrote:
Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

How about
the following rewording?

     While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is
     _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being
     reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will

Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because
strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit).

While it isn't strictly accurate I think that wording is easy enough to understand.

yes, but why would that be _better_ than saying "repeatedly reverting reversions" like i did?

regards




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux