On 11/08/2023 21:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Andy Koppe <andy.koppe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> There are a number of uses of designated initializers already, so
>> hopefully compound literals aren't too much of an extra challenge.
>
> I do not see how one leads to the other here. I'd prefer not to see
> use of a new construct we do not currently use mixed in a new code,
> even if it is mentioned in the proposed log message.
Okay.
Would this style be acceptable to fulfil Glen's request to name the
fields?
case 'D':
{
const struct decoration_options opts = {
.prefix = "",
.suffix = ""
};
format_decorations(sb, commit, c->auto_color, &opts);
}
return 1;
Andy
