On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:51:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * js/PATH (Sun Oct 21 22:59:01 2007 +0100) 1 commit > - execv_git_cmd(): also try PATH if everything else fails. > > I do not quite get why this is needed; need to go back to the > discussion myself. On the other hand, I found the alternative > approach suggested on the list very interesting (i.e. instead of > "also try", just letting exec*p use PATH, relying on the fact > that we do prepend-to-path anyway). What happened to it? Was > there a downside? The main downside that was raised was MingW compatibility, but Schindelin and Sixt both said that it could wait until further work is done porting to MingW. Should i resend my string of patches? I've seen people numbering their patches, should i do that as well? Thanks sRp -- Scott Parish http://srparish.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
