Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:59:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Presumably the next time this gets reverted we will see a doubled
reapply?

yes

Isn't that something we care about documenting as a part
of this test?  i.e. another four-line block after the above?

the third case documents that it's the same as the first case, i.e., "nothing special". so at this point we have full coverage in all regards. going beyond that would be redundant, and we'd again get into the "uh, where do we stop?" situation.

regards



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux