> +static int can_use_remote_refs(const struct add_opts *opts) > +{ > + if (!guess_remote) { > + if (!opts->quiet) > + fprintf_ln(stderr, WORKTREE_ADD_DWIM_ORPHAN_INFER_TEXT); > + return 0; > + } else if (for_each_remote_ref(first_valid_ref, NULL)) { > + return 1; > + } else if (!opts->force && remote_get(NULL)) { > + die(_("No local or remote refs exist despite at least one remote\n" > + "present, stopping; use 'add -f' to overide or fetch a remote first")); > + } else if (!opts->quiet) { > + fprintf_ln(stderr, WORKTREE_ADD_DWIM_ORPHAN_INFER_TEXT); > + } > + return 0; > +} s/overide/override? builtin/worktree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c index 4cd01842..10db70b7 100644 --- a/builtin/worktree.c +++ b/builtin/worktree.c @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int can_use_remote_refs(const struct add_opts *opts) return 1; } else if (!opts->force && remote_get(NULL)) { die(_("No local or remote refs exist despite at least one remote\n" - "present, stopping; use 'add -f' to overide or fetch a remote first")); + "present, stopping; use 'add -f' to override or fetch a remote first")); } return 0; } --- I found it when working at l10n round of 2.42.0, maybe it's not late to fix this typo: Thanks.