Re: [PATCH] describe: fix --no-exact-match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 05:27:21PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> So before I sent a patch (either to switch to using opt->value, or to
> add an UNUSED annotation), I wanted to see what you (or others) thought
> between the two. I.e., should we have a rule of "try not to operate on
> global data via option callbacks" or is that just being too pedantic for
> one-off callbacks like this?

Oh, and btw, the same situation exists for the "pack-objects --no-quiet"
earlier in this thread (which is why I was trying to establish the
general approach).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux