On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:22:40PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Since this hit 'next', Coverity complained about a small leak. Fixed by > the patch below. The patch below looks good and makes sense to me. That warning is awfully long, though ;-). In any event, I expect that 'next' will be rewound before this topic graduates, since it is meaty and we are in the middle of the -rc phase. ...and we also have my series on top [1], so it may be worthwhile for you, Jonathan, and I to figure out how to combine our efforts here. I think that this could likely get squashed in to Jonathan's topic if/after it gets ejected from 'next'. We can take my patches together in the same series, separately in a different one, or discard them altogether. If we do decide to pursue the approach in [1], I think combining everything together into one big series makes the most sense for ease of merging. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZMv14grkM7x7Sf8m@nand.local/ Thanks, Taylor
