On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:42:40PM +0200, Rubén Justo wrote:
> Let's update the error message we show when the user tries to check out
> a branch which is being used in another worktree, following the
> guideline reasoned in 4970bedef2 (branch: update the message to refuse
> touching a branch in-use, 2023-07-21).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> branch.c | 2 +-
> t/t2400-worktree-add.sh | 3 ++-
> t/t3400-rebase.sh | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
> index 3e4684f79f..98c199f7b7 100644
> --- a/branch.c
> +++ b/branch.c
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ void die_if_checked_out(const char *branch, int ignore_current_worktree)
>
> if (is_shared_symref(worktrees[i], "HEAD", branch)) {
> skip_prefix(branch, "refs/heads/", &branch);
> - die(_("'%s' is already checked out at '%s'"),
> + die(_("'%s' already used by worktree at '%s'"),
I wonder if "'%s' is already used by ..." (with the additional "is"
between the branch name and "already") would be clearer / more natural.
Thanks,
Taylor
