Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes:
> This makes sure that we get a properly translated message rather than
> inserting the command (which we failed to translate) into a generic
> fallback message.
Makes sense.
>
> The function is called indirectly via die_resolve_conflict() with fixed
> strings, and directly with the string obtained via action_name(), which
> in turn returns a string from a fixed set. Hence we know that the now
> covered set of strings is exhausitive, and will therefore BUG() out when
> encountering an unexpected string. We also know that all covered strings
> are actually used.
>
> Arguably, the above suggests that it would be cleaner to pass the
> command as an enum in the first place, but that's left for another time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - more verbose description
>
> Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> advice.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/advice.c b/advice.c
> index e5a9bb9b44..50c79443ba 100644
> --- a/advice.c
> +++ b/advice.c
> @@ -191,9 +191,10 @@ int error_resolve_conflict(const char *me)
> error(_("Pulling is not possible because you have unmerged files."));
> else if (!strcmp(me, "revert"))
> error(_("Reverting is not possible because you have unmerged files."));
> + else if (!strcmp(me, "rebase"))
> + error(_("Rebasing is not possible because you have unmerged files."));
> else
> - error(_("It is not possible to %s because you have unmerged files."),
> - me);
> + BUG("Unhandled conflict reason '%s'", me);
>
> if (advice_enabled(ADVICE_RESOLVE_CONFLICT))
> /*
