Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > (Sorry I somehow forgot to put the mailing list in Cc: of this.) This seems to be a response to an older issue of the report, but I take it that the status of these two topics haven't changed since then. >> > * cc/repack-sift-filtered-objects-to-separate-pack (2023-07-24) 8 commits >> > ... >> > Breaks CI with some environment variables configured. >> > cf. <xmqqo7jzh9mh.fsf@gitster.g> >> > source: <20230724085909.3831831-1-christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I am working on this and hope to send a version 4 soon. Sounds good. Thanks. >> > * cc/git-replay (2023-06-03) 15 commits >> > ... >> > >> > What's the status of this thing? >> > source: <20230602102533.876905-1-christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I have a 2 week long vacation starting soon, so I will likely not have >> time to work on a new round in the next 3 weeks. OK. Enjoy. >> However in a recent article >> (https://github.blog/2023-07-27-scaling-merge-ort-across-github/) >> GitHub says that they are already using git-replay (though not sure >> it's this exact version or another one), and GitLab plans to use it >> too. So there are plenty folks who are capable of reviewing but they are not interested in giving it to the general public by withholding their reviews ;-)?