"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > sequencer: factor out part of pick_commits() > rebase: fix rewritten list for failed pick > rebase --continue: refuse to commit after failed command > rebase -i: fix adding failed command to the todo list I'd really prefer to see the latter half of the series reviewed (both for the design and its implementation) by those who have more stake in the sequencer code than myself. I just noticed that we have a question on the last step left unanswered since the very initial iteration. cf. https://lore.kernel.org/git/f05deb00-1bcd-9e05-739f-6a30d6d8cf3b@xxxxxx/ Thanks.
