Emily Shaffer <nasamuffin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Or are there still further changes in behaviours planned? > > Huh, I thought that you wanted further changes. In > https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZDSTFwMFO7vbj%2Fdu@xxxxxxxxxx/ I was > asking for opinions on adding tests; if you're fine to take it without > tests, then of course I don't have an objection to an identical patch > with objectively improved grammar in the commit message. But since you > were asking for a reroll in the What's Cooking, I figured there was > more you were unhappy with in the patch. If that's not the case, by > all means, go ahead and take it. Well, this is why an overly slow reaction is bad for everybody. I quite honestly do not recall what was suggested and with what severity (was it a good to have? was it a showstopper?). Anyway, if it is not urgent and nobody else is jumping up and down and asking for an immediate inclusion of the current iteration, we can wait a bit longer without hurting anybody ;-) Thanks.
