René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes:
> A bit more verbose still: Document the negative form on its own line
> with a generated description -- requires no new syntax:
>
> -v, --invert-match show non-matching lines
> --no-invert-match opposite of --invert-match, default
> -I, --no-index find in contents not managed by git
> --index opposite of --no-index, default
I would expect _("opposite of %s, default") is acceptable by l10n
folks, and assuming it is, the above would be a good approach.
> All these imperfect solutions make me wish we could get rid of the
> problem, e.g. by converting all "no-" options to their positive variants
> and mentioning that they are the default. Won't fly, though,
> because ...
True.
Thanks.
