Re: [PATCH v2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:26:01PM -0700, Linus Arver wrote:
How about introducing a suffix (+ or -) after the word "Revert" to
indicate the application/inclusion (+) or removal (-) of a commit?

i think that falls squarely into the "too nerdy" category, like the Revert^n proposal does.

(Sorry for jumping into this thread so late, but the mention of this
topic on the recent "What's cooking" message [1] (that this topic would
be discarded) got me interested.)

i actually have finally updated my patches, but then found a problem in my script i'm using for submitting them, and want to fix that first for dogfooding purposes. shouldn't be long.

regards



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux