Re: [PATCH v4] MyFirstContribution: refrain from self-iterating too much

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> ...
>>
>> The inter/range-diff with my v3 was totally useless, but here is to
>> show three minor edits I made to Linus's version I am responding to.
>>
>>  * Simplify parenthesized "because it may be the case that".
>>
>>  * As if you were "a" reviewer, as we do not designate "the
>>    reviewer(s)" to a patch.  Anybody can (volunteer to) be a
>>    reviewer for a patch, and you can be, too.
>>
>>  * Stress that a single polished patch that comes later (because it
>>    took time to polish) is vastly preferred than flurry of "oops
>>    this is better" updates.
>
> All very reasonable and sensible. LGTM, thanks!

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux