When working on an high-value bugfix that must be given to ancient maintenance tracks, a starting point that is older than `maint` may have to be chosen. Helped-by: Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index f1774c91e9..d1e3783978 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -46,7 +46,12 @@ latest HEAD commit of `maint` or `master` based on the following cases: * If you are fixing bugs in the released version, use `maint` as the starting point (which may mean you have to fix things without using new API features on the cutting edge that recently appeared in - `master` but were not available in the released version). + `master` but were not available in the released version). If the bug + exists in an older version (e.g., commit `X` introduced the bug, and + `git describe --containx X` says `v2.30.0-rc2-gXXXXXX` has it), then + use the tip of the maintenance branch for the 2.30.x versions in the + `maint-2.30` branch in https://github.com/gitster/git[the maintainer's + repo]. * Otherwise (such as if you are adding new features) use `master`. -- 2.41.0-450-ga80be15292
