Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] sequencer: finish parsing the todo list despite an invalid first line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The structure of this new test piece, including the use of "log -1
> --format", seems to follow existing tests, and very readable.  Why
> do we have one extra level of subshell, though?  There is no "cd"
> that may affect the later test pieces, and set_something_editor that
> touches environment that may affect the later test pieces is called
> in its own subshell already.
>
> Other than that, looking good (there may be a valid reason why the
> test piece needs the subshell around it, but it was just not apparent
> to me).

Ah, now I notice that Phillip also noticed the same thing.

I just removed the outer subshell while queuing.  Thanks for working
on this, and thanks Phillip for excellent reviews.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux