Andreas Ericsson schrieb:
Johannes Sixt wrote:
But I can't think of any negative side effect if *all* exec-path
candidates are in $PATH. It's important, though, that all paths are
absolute because the tools chdir every now and then.
So long as they're added in "success:failed:failed" order, I don't see
any issues either. Assuming we stop prepending once we find something
that works, that should be a non-issue.
No, the point is exactly to let execvp() do all the work and we don't care
which of the paths is the "success". And I don't think that this has any
negative side effects.
-- Hannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
