Re: [PATCH 0/4] commit-graph: avoid looking at Bloom filter data directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Here's a few commits (and one fixup!) that could go before the second
> patch of your series, with the fixup! getting squashed into the second
> patch itself.
> 
> The first three are preparatory, but the fourth patch should allow us to
> drop the Perl hackery necessary to dump the raw contents of arbitrary
> Bloom filters.
> 
> Feel free to pick up these patches (or not), just wanted to get these
> out there as a possible suggestion.

Ah, thanks! I'm on the fence myself about whether this really needs to
be more rigorous (the Perl part just gives us an offset; we still check
that what's at the offset is correct) but since you have written the
patches already, I'll just include them.
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux