Toon Claes <toon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 1) Does it even make sense to make use git-fetch(1) use a quarantine > directory? What's the goal here? If the push gets rejected, remove the incoming packfile data together with quarantine repository? Who will be doing such a rejection and how? Does something run in the quarantine repository as its main repository while using the final one as an alternate (presumably some form of hooks) to make that decision? If these goals do not make sense, then no, it does not make sense to teach "fetch" to use a quarantine directory. Otherwise, teaching "fetch" would be a reasonable way to go forward. It is a separate issue if the mechanisms added (if any) when we tought receive-pack to use a quarantine repository are directly applicable, if if they need some twaking, in order to reuse them in the context of "git fetch". But their needing some tweaking does not mean that it does not make sense to try teaching "fetch" to use quarantine repository. Thanks.
