Am 27.06.23 um 12:05 schrieb Phillip Wood: > On 27/06/2023 08:30, Jeff King wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:09:57PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: >> >>> +for pattern in "refs/heads/" "refs/tags/" "refs/remotes" >>> +do >>> + test_perf "count $pattern: git for-each-ref | wc -l" " >>> + git for-each-ref $pattern | wc -l >>> + " >>> + >>> + test_perf "count $pattern: git for-each-ref --count-match" " >>> + git for-each-ref --count-matches $pattern >>> + " >>> +done >> >> I don't think this is a very realistic perf test, because for-each-ref >> is doing a bunch of work to generate its default format, only to have >> "wc" throw most of it away. Doing: >> >> git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' | wc -l > > That's a good point. I wondered if using a short fixed format string was even better so I tried > > git init test > cd test > git commit --allow-empty -m initial > seq 0 100000 | sed "s:\(.*\):create refs/heads/some-prefix/\1 $(git rev-parse HEAD):" | git update-ref --stdin > git pack-refs --all > hyperfine -L fmt "","--format=%\(refname\)","--format=x" 'git for-each-ref {fmt} refs/heads/ | wc -l' > > Which gives > > Benchmark 1: git for-each-ref refs/heads/ | wc -l > Time (mean ± σ): 1.150 s ± 0.010 s [User: 0.494 s, System: 0.637 s] > Range (min … max): 1.140 s … 1.170 s 10 runs > > Benchmark 2: git for-each-ref --format=%\(refname\) refs/heads/ | wc -l > Time (mean ± σ): 66.0 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 58.9 ms, System: 9.5 ms] > Range (min … max): 65.2 ms … 67.1 ms 43 runs > > Benchmark 3: git for-each-ref --format=x refs/heads/ | wc -l > Time (mean ± σ): 63.0 ms ± 0.5 ms [User: 54.3 ms, System: 9.6 ms] > Range (min … max): 62.3 ms … 65.4 ms 44 runs > > Summary > git for-each-ref --format=x refs/heads/ | wc -l ran > 1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than git for-each-ref --format=%\(refname\) refs/heads/ | wc -l > 18.25 ± 0.20 times faster than git for-each-ref refs/heads/ | wc -l You don't need no "x", by the way; using the empty string saves some cycles for me. In my Git clone, no special setup, 9931 refs: Benchmark 1: git for-each-ref --format=x | wc -l Time (mean ± σ): 25.1 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 8.7 ms, System: 16.8 ms] Range (min … max): 24.9 ms … 25.6 ms 109 runs Benchmark 2: git for-each-ref --format= | wc -l Time (mean ± σ): 24.6 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 8.3 ms, System: 16.8 ms] Range (min … max): 24.4 ms … 25.3 ms 110 runs Summary git for-each-ref --format= | wc -l ran 1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than git for-each-ref --format=x | wc -l René