Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] remote: advise about force-pushing as an alternative to reconciliation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:38 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I agree, showing this message in the middle of `git commit` is not
> > ideal. However, that's a separate issue that can be fixed later; it's
> > not part of the problem I'm trying to solve in this series.
>
> That is debatable.  Even "by the way you can pull and reconcile
> early before you have fully finished working on the topic and are
> ready to push back" is irrelevant during `git commit`.  "Reconciling
> the differences is not the only way to deal with divergence; you may
> decide to simply discard what they have with push --force" is even
> less relevant at that time.  So it seems to be very much an integral
> part of the problem you are tackling, at least to me.

I thought we just agreed that we don't need to mention force-pushing
in this particular message? I guess you're saying that we'd still be
over-encouraging `git pull` if we don't remove this message from `git
commit` altogether?

-Alex




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux