Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Our caller passes in an imap_server_conf struct, but we ignore it > totally, and instead read the config directly from the global "server" > variable. This works OK, since our sole caller will pass in that same > global variable. This obviously is the right thing to do. A much inferiour alternative would be to drop the srvc parameter to the callee and that will make it clear that we are only working on the singleton 'imap_server_conf' all the time (which is not entirely incorrect), but I do not think there is no point in making any large change to this program at this point in either direction. > But the intent seems to have been to use the passed-in > variable, as otherwise it has no purpose (and many other functions use > the same pattern). Yup. Thanks.
