Re: [PATCH v4] unit tests: Add a project plan document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In our current testing environment, we spend a significant amount of
> effort crafting end-to-end tests for error conditions that could easily
> be captured by unit tests (or we simply forgo some hard-to-setup and
> rare error conditions). Describe what we hope to accomplish by
> implementing unit tests, and explain some open questions and milestones.
> Discuss desired features for test frameworks/harnesses, and provide a
> preliminary comparison of several different frameworks.
>
> Coauthored-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

> TODOs remaining:
> - List rough priorities across comparison dimensions
> - Group dimensions into sensible categories
> - Discuss pre-existing harnesses for the current test suite
> - Discuss harness vs. framework features, particularly for parallelism
> - Figure out how to evaluate frameworks on additional OSes such as *BSD
>   and NonStop
> - Add more discussion about desired features (particularly mocking)
> - Add dimension for test timing
> - Evaluate remaining missing comparison table entries

Listing these explicitly here is very much appreciated.  Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux