On 2023-06-28 at 16:28:28, Adam Majer wrote: > Hi all, > > Is sha256 still considered experimental or can it be assumed to be stable? > > The usecase here is we are planning on moving to sha256 repositories mostly > due to integrity guarantees, hypothetical or otherwise. What is important is > not the initial interop challenges with sha1 repos, but whether the on-disk > format will remain compatible with future versions of git. At minimum, the > on-disk format would be converted by some future version(s) of git into > another one and not be an end-of-the-road because it was "experimental" > where dataloss is an implied risk. I have no intention of changing things at this point. I think it should be viewed as stable by now, and I'd support this patch, although to get it picked up it will need a commit message and a sign-off. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
