On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:49:43AM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > I am left wondering: why doesn't the rule pertaining to > refs/heads/foo/baz show up in the included list? Likewise, what happens > with refs/heads/bar/baz/quux? It is a child of an excluded rule, so the > question is which list takes priority. > > Mostly, I am wondering if I am missing something that would explain why > you couldn't modify the above example's excluded list to contain > something like "!refs/heads/bar/baz/quux", eliminating the need for the > include list entirely. Another potential quirk that I just now thought of: what are the rules for what can go in the include list? Fully qualified references only? Or can we have patterns (e.g. refs/foo/bar/*). Presumably you'd want to have the namespace-stripping operator ^, but not !, since negating an include rule seems to imply that it should be in the exclude list. Thanks, Taylor
