Hi, On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > > > > If I were to suggest any improvements, it'd be to change the > > > semantics of git-pull to always update the local branches set up to > > > be merged with the remote tracking branches when they, prior to > > > fetching, pointed to the same commit, such that when > > > > > > $ git show-ref master > > > d4027a816dd0b416dc8c7b37e2c260e6905f11b6 refs/heads/master > > > d4027a816dd0b416dc8c7b37e2c260e6905f11b6 refs/remotes/origin/master > > > > > > refs/heads/master gets set to refs/remotes/origin/master post-fetch. > > > > In general, this should fail. Because you are expected to have local > > changes in the local branches. > > > BS argument. Aha. So you want to make sure that the local branches are no longer "purely" local. And you want to stop updating them when unpushed changes are in the local branches. Seems I cannot help you. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
