On 11-jun-2023 23:26:15, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:49:51PM +0200, Rubén Justo wrote: > > > The return introduced in bdaf1dfae7 was to avoid setting up the > > tracking, but even in that case it is still necessary to do the > > clean-up. Let's do it. > > That may be a sign that the return introduced by that commit is in the > wrong spot (i.e., could we be checking it earlier and returning before > doing the work that led to the allocations?). > > But I didn't look too carefully, and I think for the purposes of your > series it is OK to simply fix the leak without digging too far. Thanks. > > I'll cc the author (and quote the patch below) though, as sometimes in > cases like these they may be interested in looking deeper themselves. Perfect. Thank you.
