Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes: >>Why a new subcommand, not a new option to "push"? Adding a new >>subcommand would mean it would be another unfamiliar thing users >>need to learn, as opposed to a slight variation of what they are >>already familiar with. >> > to be fair, there's also `apply` and not `pop --keep`. I do not care all that much if that is fair, but I do not think it is a meaningful comparison. "stash apply" is merely exposing the first half (the other half is "stash drop") of a two step operation that is "stash pop".
