Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: >> > That being said I'd be fine to change this series to mean "-Z changes >> > stdout" if you insist. In that case we should be pointing out in our >> > documentation that "You should never use `-z` without `-Z` when you >> > process arbitrary input". >> >> You are not making sense. If we were to leave them orthogonal to >> keep flexibility, it is because there can be cases where using '-Z' >> without using '-z' (and vice versa) makes sense; "you should never" >> has no place to live in such a world. > > Well, that's exactly what I'm arguing: I don't think it does make sense > to keep them orthogonal. I was not commenting on that. My "you are not making sense" was because you said "I'd be fine to make -Z to mean 'stdout is NUL delimited'". If somebody thinks it is a good idea to make '-Z' mean 'stdout is NUL delimited without affecting how the input is delimited', it can only be because that somebody thinks that it makes sense to make input and output orthogonal. It is perfectly OK if you are not fine to make -Z to affect only the standard output stream. That stance is at least self consistent.
