Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> -+ *** Commands *** >> -+ 1: [s]tatus 2: [u]pdate 3: [r]evert 4: [a]dd untracked >> -+ 5: [p]atch 6: [d]iff 7: [q]uit 8: [h]elp >>... > ... The reason is that we're no-longer testing that we > add "[]" around the text that would have been highlighted if color was > enabled. That is with --color we print "1: status" with the "s" > highlighted rather than "1: [s]tatus". So while the revised patch > tests there is no color in the output, it does not test that we print > the output correctly in that case. Interesting. My understanding was that the new test is about when coloring gets triggered (namely, does the configuration variable set to false disable the coloring?), and we had test coverage about how coloring affects the output elsewhere (hence this one does not have to test the same thing).
