Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] t/lib-gpg: introduce new prereq GPG2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 08:50:18AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:31 AM Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +test_lazy_prereq GPG2 '
> > +       gpg_version=$(gpg --version 2>&1)
> > +       test $? != 127 || exit 1
> > +
> > +       case "$gpg_version" in
> > +       "gpg (GnuPG) 0."* | "gpg (GnuPG) 1.*")
> 
> s/"gpg (GnuPG) 1.*"/"gpg (GnuPG) 1."*/
> 
> I am not sure if it changes anything, but for testing if we have v0
> here and v1.0.6 in the "test_lazy_prereq PGP", we put the '*'
> character outside the double quoted string.

It does seem that it changes things, thanks for catching. I'll reroll
with the necessary changes (there are also some style issues that
Oswald pointed out).

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux