On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 9:50 PM Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > PATCH 1/2 introduces a new prereq GPG2 for the purpose of testing stuff > that breaks with GPG version <= v2. This is evident from the CI failure > in [1] that was sent with the same subject as this series (more info > below). > > PATCH 2/2 adds a new "signature" atom, which is a duplication of the %G* > formats in pretty. This was sent before by Nsengiyumva Wilberforce and > was in "seen" until May and was removed because of CI failure. I have > built upon it and have done some minor changes to it. The CI jobs are > now successful which can be found at [2]. > > [1]: Patch > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230311210607.64927-1-nsengiyumvawilberforce@xxxxxxxxx/ I don't think it's a big issue, but, as there are only minor change, it might have been easier to refer to the previous work by just calling this a v6 of the same patch series and using the --in-reply-to=<message id> option of git format-patch to send it so it would be in the same email thread as the previous work. Now that a new series was started though, I think it makes more sense for any improvement to this series to just be called v2 and be sent using --in-reply-to=<message id> so that it is in the same thread as this series. Thanks!
