Teng Long <dyroneteng@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Teng Long <dyroneteng@xxxxxxxxx> > > 1. "--[no-]separator" to an independent patch which suggested by Junio[1]. I did suggest but not quite. The 4th step you are fixing is already in 'next'. You do not replace a commit in a series that has been cooking there for a long time. In a more perfect world, you would have sent the "--separator" thing that already supported "--no-separator" from the get-go. You would also have sent the 4th step that does not need ubsan fix. You do not have the luxury to do so when your series hit 'next'---you need to live with your earlier mistakes. Until we cross the release boundary, that is. I'll revert the whole thing out of 'next'. Once the next cycle opens after the dust from the release settles (i.e. around 10th of June or so), please resubmit the series that does not need "oops, we probably should have added '--[no-]separator' from the get-go" or "oops, we had undefined behaviour here, and here is a fix", as if you are a more perfect developer than you were when the version that has been queued in 'next' was written (and in fact, you are, after discussing the design and UBSan issues and stuff during the review). Thanks.
