Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Fix empty SHA-256 clones with v0 and v1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-05-18 at 18:28:38, Jeff King wrote:
> I'm still a little puzzled why we need http tests both in t5551 and
> t5700. Not too big a deal to have redundant tests, obviously, but I
> wonder if I am missing something.

Technically, they work with v0 and v1, which are separate, and I wanted
to test both, not just v0.  I realize that practically, they are very
similar, but I prefer to be a bit more thorough.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux