Re: .gittattributes handling has deficiencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote:

On Oct 21, 2007, at 11:19 AM, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

But this is really hard to solve. We would need to compare
attributes before and after for _all_ files that have attributes
in one of the two commits and check if they changed. If so, we
need to do a fresh checkout according to the new attributes.

if you know that you will get the new .gitattributes if it changes, setup a post-checkout hook to checkout everything if it has changed. it's far from ideal, but it should be a good, safe, first approximation.


That's not good enough. I'll stop using .gitattributes. I
need to teach >40 devs how to use git on Windows. I only use
features that work flawlessly. .gitattributes doesn't. It bit
me twice now.

why would checking everything out if .gitattributes has changed not work? I can see why _not_ doing so would cause problems, and I freely acknowledge that this approach imposes a performance hit by checking everything out twice, but I don't see how it would not be reliable.

David Lang

Luckily, core.autocrlf works if you set it before the first
checkout and never change it. This seems sufficient for me if
all files that have mixed line endings are fixed right away.

	Steffen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux