On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:23:49AM +0000, René Scharfe wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > builtin-apply.c | 2 +- > > builtin-archive.c | 2 +- > > diff.c | 4 ++-- > > entry.c | 2 +- > > strbuf.h | 8 +++++++- > > test-delta.c | 3 ++- > > 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > I have a feeling this is going in then wrong direction. Shouldn't > we rather use size_t everywhere? malloc() takes a size_t, and it's > the basis of strbuf and also of the file content functions. I agree, Junio was working on a patch that generalized use of size_t's when unsigned long where used and size_t meant, I suppose he didn't had the time to push it. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpsbK4EN62AI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
