Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > A better way to spot that would be to start parsing the coccinelle logs, > and detect when we have unknown parsing issues, and error on those. But > until then... Until then, I do not think a rather costly test that has found only 4 instances of the mistakes the test was designed to find is a good way to stand in as a replacement. Let's drop it, as it is easy to resurrect if somebody wants to run it from time to time from an old version of Git. Or is it a valid alternative to move it to "pending"? Thanks.
