On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 01:43:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > > > Considering that both multi-remote and submodule fetches are user-facing > > features, using them in conjunction with `--porcelain` that is intended > > for scripting purposes is likely not going to be useful in the majority > > of cases. With that in mind these restrictions feel acceptable. If > > usecases for either of these come up in the future though it is easy > > enough to add a new "porcelain-v2" format that adds this information. > > Two steps ago, the proposed log message still mentioned "--output-format", > which may want to be proofread again and revised. It's a relict from previous iterations. I've fixed the preceding patch to talk about `--porcelain` instead. > > @@ -1786,7 +1810,8 @@ static int add_remote_or_group(const char *name, struct string_list *list) > > return 1; > > } > > > > -static void add_options_to_argv(struct strvec *argv) > > +static void add_options_to_argv(struct strvec *argv, > > + enum display_format format) > > { > > if (dry_run) > > strvec_push(argv, "--dry-run"); > > @@ -1822,6 +1847,8 @@ static void add_options_to_argv(struct strvec *argv) > > strvec_push(argv, "--ipv6"); > > if (!write_fetch_head) > > strvec_push(argv, "--no-write-fetch-head"); > > + if (format == DISPLAY_FORMAT_PORCELAIN) > > + strvec_pushf(argv, "--porcelain"); > > } > > Hmph. > > [PATCH 9/8] may want to also introduce and pass down the > "--output-format=full/compact" option, but that is clearly outside > of the scope of this step. We don't have `--output-format` now though, but only the `--porcelain` switch. The only way to configure "full"/"compact" output formats is via the "fetch.output" config variable right now. > > +static int opt_parse_porcelain(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset) > > +{ > > + enum display_format *format = opt->value; > > + *format = DISPLAY_FORMAT_PORCELAIN; > > + return 0; > > +} > > Lack of "if (unset) ..." worries me. Shouldn't the code allow > > git fetch --porcelain --no-porcelain > > to defeat an earlier one and revert back to the default? We pass `PARSE_OPT_NOARG|PARSE_OPT_NONEG`, so this isn't really much of a concern. But yeah, it wouldn't allow `--no-porcelain`, and supporting it is trivial enough to do. I'll change this to a `OPT_BOOL()`. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature