Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
"Linus Arver via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
From: Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx>
The phrase "is specified" is implied. Make it explicit.
Makes sense. Calling it "implied" is generous ;-)
Haha yes, I suppose so. I wrote "implied" because supplying the
(missing) phrase "is specified" was the only way I could make sense of
the existing wording.
Isn't the
original just outright ungrammatical?
Indeed.
Should I combine 01+06 together?
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/git-interpret-trailers.txt | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-interpret-trailers.txt
b/Documentation/git-interpret-trailers.txt
index e80a9cd161b..c4675d9d3bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-interpret-trailers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-interpret-trailers.txt
@@ -248,10 +248,10 @@ for the same <token>, 'trailer.<token>.cmd' is
used and
'trailer.<token>.command' is ignored.
trailer.<token>.cmd::
- This option can be used to specify a shell command that will be called:
- once to automatically add a trailer with the specified <token>, and
then
- each time a '--trailer <token>=<value>' argument to modify the <value>
of
- the trailer that this option would produce.
+ This option can be used to specify a shell command that will be called
once
+ to automatically add a trailer with the specified <token>, and then
called
+ each time a '--trailer <token>=<value>' argument is specified to
modify the
+ <value> of the trailer that this option would produce.
+
When the specified command is first called to add a trailer
with the specified <token>, the behavior is as if a special
