Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sure, I'm happy to rename ll-merge to merge-ll. I prefer a suffix > since it is common to see files sorted by filename (whether by Git or > by the shell) and the suffix tends to keep similar-ish files together. It can go both ways, though. Grouping lower-level things together has values, too ;-). If foo and foo-lowleve needs to be grouped and read together to be understood, it is a sign that the conceptual separation between the higher- and lower-level things is not done cleanly enough. Having said that, I do not care too deeply either way, as long as it makes it easier to locate what we need to in the end result. Thanks.
