Junio C Hamano wrote: > Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes: > > On 27/03/2023 10:17, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> Paul, is there anything I can do to help you integrate this into `gitk`? > >> Or is it time to pass over `gitk` maintenance to the Git project? > > > > I just tripped over this problem while trying to de-stack my Git backlog > > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/4408 "sdk gitk interaction". > * The two patches that originate from GfW have been applied on top > of 465f0386 in the gitk history; the result of this is 7dd272ec > (gitk: escape file paths before piping to git log, 2023-01-24). Why only those patches? Does patches signed off by GfW developers carry a special status regardless of their content? -- Felipe Contreras