Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] strbuf cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I intend to reroll it, as well as rewording the commit patches 4 and 5
as per Elijah's suggestions. I didn't originally realize you were
referring to s/environment variable/global variable as the misnomer
(since the dependency I was removing was from environment.h)

On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 3:33 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Strbuf is a widely used basic structure that should only interact with
> > other primitives in strbuf.[ch]. Over time certain functions inside of
> > strbuf.[ch] have been added to interact with higher level objects and
> > functions. This series cleans up some of those higher level interactions
> > by moving the offending functions to the files they interact with and
> > adding documentation to strbuf.h. With the goal of eventually being able
> > to stand up strbuf as a libary, this series also removes the use of
> > environment variables from strbuf.
>
> This round hasn't seen any comments (mine does not count ;-).  The
> 7/7-only v3 still says "environment variable" to refer to a global
> variable, so I am not sure where we stand.  Is this back-burnered?
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux