El 20/10/2007, a las 8:45, Michael Witten escribió:
On 20 Oct 2007, at 2:36:28 AM, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Today I move the file, then unstage the hunks I'm not sure about,
then go back and restage them. Annoying. It really disrupts
my workflow.
I know it's against policy, but the proposed change should be set
as the default at some point, in my opinion.
I think the issue here is that git-mv as it is currently implemented
really conflates two things:
1. Renaming a file in the traditional "mv" sense
2. Staging the entire contents of the file in the index, ready or not
So it's kind of like the command were called git-mv-and-add or git-
rename-and-add. And given that the index as a staging area is such a
central content in Git, users often want to have more control over
what gets added to the index than that; ie. "I really just wanted to
rename the file, and leave the staging of modifications to the
content up to me".
Cheers,
Wincent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
