Shuqi Liang wrote: > diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh > index 3c140103c5..7ebcfe785e 100755 > --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh > +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh > @@ -1377,7 +1377,10 @@ test_expect_success 'index.sparse disabled inline uses full index' ' > ! test_region index ensure_full_index trace2.txt > ' > > -ensure_not_expanded () { > +ensure_index_state () { > + local expected_expansion="$1" > + shift > + > rm -f trace2.txt && > if test -z "$WITHOUT_UNTRACKED_TXT" > then > @@ -1398,7 +1401,21 @@ ensure_not_expanded () { > >sparse-index-out \ > 2>sparse-index-error || return 1 > fi && > - test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt > + > + if [ "$expected_expansion" = "expanded" ] > + then > + test_region index ensure_full_index trace2.txt > + else > + test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt > + fi > +} > + > +ensure_expanded () { > + ensure_index_state "expanded" "$@" > +} > + > +ensure_not_expanded () { > + ensure_index_state "not_expanded" "$@" > } This still seems a bit more complicated than necessary (mainly due to the new string comparison & local arg). What about something like this (applied on top)? -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- 8< -------- diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh index 9d11d28891..333822f322 100755 --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh @@ -1377,10 +1377,7 @@ test_expect_success 'index.sparse disabled inline uses full index' ' ! test_region index ensure_full_index trace2.txt ' -ensure_index_state () { - local expected_expansion="$1" - shift - +run_sparse_index_trace2 () { rm -f trace2.txt && if test -z "$WITHOUT_UNTRACKED_TXT" then @@ -1400,22 +1397,17 @@ ensure_index_state () { git -C sparse-index "$@" \ >sparse-index-out \ 2>sparse-index-error || return 1 - fi && - - if [ "$expected_expansion" = "expanded" ] - then - test_region index ensure_full_index trace2.txt - else - test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt fi } ensure_expanded () { - ensure_index_state "expanded" "$@" + run_sparse_index_trace2 "$@" && + test_region index ensure_full_index trace2.txt } ensure_not_expanded () { - ensure_index_state "not_expanded" "$@" + run_sparse_index_trace2 "$@" && + test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt } test_expect_success 'sparse-index is not expanded' ' -------- >8 -------- >8 -------- >8 -------- That said, given that this is my only complaint with this iteration (and it's pretty subjective), if others are happy with it then I'm not opposed to merging to 'next'.