Re: [PATCH] git-cherry-pick: improve description of -x.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank Lichtenheld <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:41:34PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Further, I am surprised that -x seems to be nonfunctional when the
> > cherry pick introduces a conflict.  Example:
> [...]
> > The prototype commit message now does not contain the
> > | (cherry picked from commit ...).
> > 
> > Is that by design (because there were conflicts) or an omission?
> > In case of the former, maybe the description of -x should mention this.
> 
> git commit currently doesn't know that you commit a cherry-pick. The -c
> only says to use the commit message of the original commit. So this is
> currently by design.

Ralf, can you submit an updated version of this patch that describes
the current behavior better, given the "by design" remark above
from Frank?
 
-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux