On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:03:00AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Well, the important thing is that the _content_ is moving from the > remote repository to the local one. That's how the arrow should be > interpreted conceptually. The fact that technically we end up assigning > the local ref with the remote value is a technical issue. If the _content_ is moving from the remote repository to the local one, I would think the arrow should be pointing from the remote repoistory to the local one, i.e.: * 895be02..2fe5433 next <- spearce/next But right now we are proposing: * 895be02..2fe5433 next -> spearce/next I would think the former makes more sense is the content is going *from* spearce/next into the local next branch. This isn't a huge deal, but these tiny things make a large amount of difference in usability for the novice who just getting started with git.... - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
