Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > No, it's for the formatting machinery. > > The fact that both asciidoc and asciidoctor happen to understand our quircky > formatting in this particualr situation doesn't mean it isn't quirky. > > In this particular case the parsers do understand what we are trying to do, > because we just just pepper list continuations (`+`) everywhere and it happens > to work. I'll stop at pointing out that the first "no" sounds much stronger than the text that tries to substantiate it, which says that the machinery works fine without the changes. > This discrepancy confused Jeff in [1]. And this is a good reason to add this change for humans. > It's simply a good practice to follow the format asciidoctor documentation: That one I would agree with 100%. Thanks.
