Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] diff-files: integrate with sparse index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shuqi Liang wrote:
> Hi Victoria,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm still in the middle of my final exams period.

No problem at all, thanks for following up!

> It's true that in the case of 'diff-files', expanding the sparse directory to
> match a pathspec to its contents might not be necessary. If we don't use
> pathspec expansion in this case. It could optimize for performance better.
> 
> However, there could be some edge cases. if a user manually modifies the
> contents of a SKIP_WORKTREE file in the working tree, the diff between
> the working tree and the index would no longer be empty. So I think, In this
> case, expanding the sparse directory might still be necessary to ensure the
> correct behavior of the 'diff-files' command.

If a user manually modifies a SKIP_WORKTREE file, SKIP_WORKTREE will be
removed from the file and the index expanded automatically [1]. If that
mechanism is working properly, there would be no need to manually check the
pathspec and expand the index.

Have you tried removing the 'pathspec_needs_expanded_index()' and running
the tests? If so, is 'diff-files' producing incorrect results? 

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/11d46a399d26c913787b704d2b7169cafc28d639.1642175983.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux